The small Texas town where Trump’s wall will destroy households and subsistences

Deep in the deep Rio Grande Valley, plans for president Trumps wall would cut through towns and communities. In Madero, families dread the loss of their subsistence but pledge to resist

Rey Anzaldua walks the path, through a pluvial afternoon on the Rio Grande reach opposite Mexico, towards the little church where he has adored” since I was five years old “- the lovely chapel of La Lomita, built in 1865 on a Spanish land grant of 1767. It is a jewel: candle smoke and the musky odor of whitewashed stone wrapping the Virgin of Guadalupe icon and offerings of flowers and corn.

Rey’s family has been here since the 1750 s. His extended family” had three Spanish land grants between 16,000 and 18,000 acres along the Rio Grande river and the bridge between ,” Rey said.” We don’t have much of that now .”

Rey has served his time and country as special agent for US customs- stopping contraband north and southbound- and wears his Vietnam Veteran’s cap and coat. He and his family still own land along the river border here, and nearby.

That’s the problem.

Hard to imagine, but the levee operating beside La Lomita chapel, in the tiny hamlet of Madero in Texas’s south-west corner, has been battered by- but survived- hurricanes and inundates, and is now designated to be the course of a new border wall, cutting the chapel off from its congregation. This wall was planned before Donald Trump’s national emergency, budgeted under the presidencies of George W Bush and Barak Obama.

Father Roy Snipes, known locally as the “cowboy priest” for his Stetson hat, leadings prayers for his chapel to be spared.” It would still be a sacred place ,” he said,” but it would be a sacred place that was desecrated .”


Cousins Fred Cavazos and Rey Anzaldua, whose family has been farming the borderlands since the 1780 s. Photograph: Ed Vulliamy

” I insured it all as a customs agent ,” Rey said.” Working both sides of the border. Cocaine and you-name-it coming north, handguns and fund going south. One haul heading to Mexico was 60,000 rounds of ammo .” So his view is that of a professional , not only a landowner.

” You got to ask yourself: why are all the medications and illegal immigrants coming through? Why? Because of the demand for illegal drugs and illegal labour , not much different from Al Capone and proscription. Do I, as a retired customs agent, believe the wall will stop that? Oh, is everything all right .”

This is the deep Rio Grande Valley, South of McAllen, Texas, where the river operates its final course towards the gulf estuary. And among the things that mark this ferociously proud perimeter country from most others is the preponderance of privately-owned land along the road of proposed walls, rather than public land more readily sequestered, according to a report last year commissioned by the American Civil Liberties Union. And many of those landowners refuse to comply, like the Anzaldua-Cabazos cousins.

Fred Cavazos is unable to join us at the chapel and down on his riverfront land today; he moves thanks to a wheelchair and the dirt is deep. So we convene at his home half a couple miles out, over maps and schemes sent there by the government.

Fred operates his thumb along red lines that mark the wall’s trajectory- and the 150 ft” enforcement zone”, which includes a patrol road- across his land.

” This is where it’ll run, along the levee by the chapel, taking out a couple of houses, some of the RV park- but there’s a lot of businesses on the other side, including mine. What happens to them ?”

” It started with letters from the government, last September ,” Fred said. The map arrived with the first, from the Department of Homeland Security demanding’ Right-of-Entry For Survey and Site Assessment ‘, and the three that followed it. Each one ends with a line for signature of acquiescence by the landowner. On Fred’s letters, they are still blank.

” Our strategy is silence ,” he said.” I will not agree to this .”

The serial challenges by the Anzaldua and Cavazos families to walls already constructed or due to be built present a model for the kind of private litigation by landowners- in addition to that by 16 states and environmental groups- chairperson Trump would face even if he overcomes congressional opposition to his proposed national emergency.

” People far away, want the wall ,” Rey said,” but hardly anyone down here. There’s less illegals than there used to be- though we do get a car chase now and then- and there’s no crisis on the border. When Donald Trump came to see you”- two weeks before our conversation-” all he talked to was a few people who want the wall and law enforcement. He didn’t speak to a single landowner; they just don’t understand our ties to the land, on both sides of the border. There’s a village called Cavazos over on the other side- that’s household .”


Rey Anzaldua on family land on the Rio Grande River, with Tamaulipas, Mexico, on the far bank. Photograph: Ed Vulliamy
Ten years ago , the Department of Homeland Security came for his land at nearby Granjeno.” It was a partial victory, merely because we fought all the way. They got their fence, and we lost access to the river, which has been a nightmare. But under the initial proposal, 25 -3 0 houses would have been lost. They moved the wall by 50 yards, we are therefore didn’t lose the houses .”

Now Fred faces loss of access to his livelihood: he has divided 70 acres of his land on the riverfront into 50 ft-wide lots onto which 30 tenants- mostly local- have constructed decks and shanties, for fishing and collecting, feeing and camping.

” The renters pay each year”, he said,” and I use the rent for taxes and bills. Now I worry I won’t get that fund .” Fred has cattle too, which traverse the wall’s proposed track,” and we won’t know where to set that cattle now “.

At some points along stretchings of wall that have cut across private property, gates are installed, with pin-code locks.” But even if we’re lucky enough to get a gate, who gets the code ?” Fred wondered.” Do all my renters get the code? Do the bad guys make sure to get the code ?”

” Most of the people come across to work ,” Fred said,” in hospitality and agriculture, like they did since I was born and Grandma used to bake’ em cakes and feed rice and cheese when they came to work the ranch- cotton, watermelon and cabbage in them days .”

Addressing the strategy of silent response to the letters, Rey said,” We can try to delay it as long as we can. We can try to hold them up, but I’m afraid that’s all .”

” What can you do ?” Fred asked rhetorically.” They call it private land, but when the government wants it, it’s not. Whatever we do, they’ll win; they’ll construct their wall anyway .”


A definitive report on the politics and legacy of perimeter walls and fencing was commissioned by the ACLU from Stephanie Herweck and Scott Nicol, who teach at colleges in McAllen.

” As we see from Fred’s and Rey’s instances ,” Scott said ,” sacrosanct property rights in America are inviolable, until they get in the way .” Nicol points out that landowners who have defied the initial demands for entry onto their property ended up getting paid higher quantities for land than those who agreed:” People think if they opposed, they’ll lose. But they should realise that throwing a wrench in the works can be advantageous in itself .”

Scott sketches out the dramatic impact the wall will have:” Community are built on rivers. But if Trump gets the wall he wants, we’ll be completely cut off from the river, after centuries. The only view we’ll have of it will be from the bridges to Mexico. The Rio Grande Valley will be that no longer .”

” We’re the losers if this wall gets built ,” Fred said.” This land is all we have. This is where we learned to hunt and fish; where our parents taught us the value of work, and to enjoy working the land. If they build this wall, my property’s a no man’s land on the far side .”

Read more:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *